PricingBrew

Insights & Tips

Already a subscriber? Login

Become a subscriber and unlock an information arsenal focused on making your pricing efforts more effective.

Rafe’s “Rare” Mea Culpa On Cost-Plus Pricing

It doesn’t happen often…because I’m so very rarely wrong 🙂 …but today, I feel compelled to offer a mea culpa…and clarification…about cost-plus pricing.

For many years, cost-plus pricing has been reviled and ridiculed as being the very antithesis of effective pricing. Nearly every pricing pundit in the space has taken at least one turn…and sometimes ten…bashing cost-plus pricing as a bane to pricing excellence that must be eradicated.

Over time, cost-plus has become such a taboo that many pricing people are actually ashamed to admit that they do it. And even those that do manage to confess still feel like they have to whisper!

Now, I’ve been an active participant in the “chorus of condemnation” surrounding cost-plus pricing for a very long time. And for that, I’m sorry. Or at least, I’m sorry that my condemnation of cost-plus pricing hasn’t been more precise.

To be clear, there’s nothing particularly taboo or heretical about applying a markup over cost to arrive at a price-point. That’s just basic math. And assuming your calculator hasn’t been fried in a microwave, working the equation will indeed produce a number each and every time.

The problem isn’t the mathematical equation. The problem is the lack of variability and accuracy of the “plus” that’s being used in the mathematical equation.

Are you applying a 25% adder when it really should be 27.4%? Are you applying a 35% markup across the board when you really should be applying 16 different markups to align to 16 discrete price segments? Are you applying a 30% markup where the perceived value actually justifies at 42% markup?

In reality, some of the most sophisticated price segmentation models in use today…models with 100’s of thousands of different segments and prices…will very often use cost-plus equations to generate all of those different price-points. Of course, the precise markups being used in each segment are based on relative price sensitivity or willingness-to-pay measures, but technically it’s still cost-plus.

The point is that it’s not about the math you use to generate the price-points….it’s about whether or not those price-points ultimately align to the real differences in perceived value and willingness-to-pay that exist in your marketplace.

Get Immediate Access To Everything In The PricingBrew Journal

Related Resources

  • When to Choose Profit, Revenue, or Both

    As pricing people in B2B, we all have to deal with the "corporate schizophrenia" around revenue versus profit. In this conversation with Lydia DiLiello, we discuss how pricing teams can best deal with this oftentimes frustrating dynamic.

    View This Interview
  • The Right Way to Manage and Enable Change

    How do you encourage, enable, and manage organizational change when the deck is stacked against you? In this in-depth interview, Scott McAllister and Suraj Mohandas share the quantifiable benefits of effective change management and expose the essential steps that are required to get it right.

    View This Interview
  • How to Leverage Big Data & Pricing Science

    In this expert interview, Jim Vaughn, the author of a new book called "Stop Racing in a Blindfold," talks about how to combine Big Data and Pricing Science to drive better financial results, at scale, and on a go-forward basis.

    View This Interview
  • Can You Benefit from Better Deal Management?

    Horror stories of unprofitable or poorly managed deals seem to be all too common in B2B. In this guide by Elliot Yama, learn the common causes of bad deals and four signs that your deal management process is lacking.

    View This Guide