Insights & Tips

Already a subscriber? Login

Become a subscriber and unlock an information arsenal focused on making your pricing efforts more effective.

Breaking Bad Assumptions About Leading Pricing Teams

There’s an old saying about what can happen when you “assume” too much. I won’t repeat it here…you can look it up on the interwebs if you’re unfamiliar…but let’s just stipulate that assumptions are very often wrong and can lead to inaccurate conclusions and less-than-ideal outcomes.

I was reminded of this truth in a recent conversation with a Senior Director who was debating whether or not to secure a group subscription for his team. You see, this Director was on the fence about subscribing because he assumed that they were a leading team already and therefore wouldn’t have much to gain or learn from a publication such as ours.

Why did he assume they were already a leading team? Because their team was relatively large and had been operating inside a leading company for nearly two decades.

Now, I can’t fault this person too much for assuming that this is what constitutes or defines a “leading” team. After all, these particular assumptions are actually fairly common and broadly held. That said, these assumptions just don’t stand up under closer scrutiny…or match what we’ve observed in the marketplace.

For example, just because the parent company is a leader doesn’t mean that all the functional groups within that company are also leaders among their functional-group peers. In fact, we’ve run across many companies that excel at designing and manufacturing particular products, while at the same time having only the most rudimentary capabilities in other areas of their business.

Are they leaving money on the table? Of course! But the reality is that tremendous strength in one area can hide huge deficiencies in a lot of other areas…and for a very long time.

So what about team size? Or tenure? On their own, these things are just not that indicative of leadership in functional capability. While a big team might be able to do more, it might also be wildly inefficient and difficult to manage. And while a long-established team might have learned more through trial and error, they might also become more entrenched in the status quo and resistant to change.

From what we’ve seen, there are lots of big teams…that have been around for a very long time…in some really high-profile companies…that are actually behind the curve when it comes to functional capabilities. On the other hand, we’ve also seen that there are many relatively small and newer teams…in companies you’ve not heard of yet…that are doing amazingly things and blazing new trails.

The point is that when we talk about “leading teams,” we’re not necessarily talking about the oldest teams, the biggest teams, or even teams within the most well-known companies. Of course, some of the teams we reference do actually possess many or all of these characteristics. But to be clear, these characteristics are not the reasons we look to them as leaders.

From our perspective, leading teams are defined by what they are doing…their actions and results…and not by their outward appearances.

So, if appearances aren’t reliable, how do you know whether you’re a leader or a laggard? If you’re already a subscriber, you can certainly use our capability assessment to better understand how your function stacks up.

But if you’re not yet a subscriber, I would suggest perusing our catalog. The range of topics we cover and content we provide should give you a pretty good idea as to what the leading teams are doing.

When you look at our catalog, if it all seems like “old hat” and stuff you already do all day, every day, then you might be a leading team. But if a lot of it is new and different and doesn’t seem to line up with your day-to-day….well…there’s your answer.

Get Immediate Access To Everything In The PricingBrew Journal

Related Resources

  • Making Change Happen

    How do you get executives to recognize a need for change? How do you get an organization to move away from the status quo and actually embrace doing things differently? How do you foster true adoption, as opposed to merely forced compliance?

    View This Webinar
  • Identifying the Right Unit of Value for Pricing

    Simple pricing structures can hurt revenues and profits when they fail to align customer value and costs. This case study demonstrates how to identify the right "unit of value" for both pricing and costing purposes.

    View This Case Study
  • Identifying Your Value Along Five Dimensions

    It's best to present a well-rounded set of criteria upon which customers can base a buying decision. In this guide, you'll learn about five dimensions of value with over 50 potential value-drivers that can influence buying decisions.

    View This Diagnostic
  • Why Pricing Initiatives Fail

    In B2B, some pricing initiatives just don’t work out as planned—they either struggle to produce worthwhile results or they fail outright. So, how do we avoid making the same mistakes that have derailed other initiatives?

    View This Webinar